Re: [Denemo-devel] Release 1.0.2

[Richard Shann]

It all looks good, I've revised the comment about the 1.03 windows
binary.
With all the code tidying now in master we should allow a fair amount of
testing time to 1.04 I think.

Richard


On Tue, 2013-05-14 at 15:52 -0500, Jeremiah Benham wrote:
> I made the release announcements on facebook, LAU, and LAA. I also
> updated the website to use the correct links to the binaries (They are
> not appearing on gnu.org for some reason. They are probably blocking
> it because of the file size and the fact that they are binaries. I
> don't know). The binaries are in denemo.org/downloads. I could
> probably keep 2 binary releases for each platform before I start
> deleting old versions.
> 
> 
> Jeremiah 
> 
> 
> 
> On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 11:31 PM, Jeremiah Benham
> <address@hidden> wrote:
>         I uploaded the tarball and the binaries but I only see the
>         tarball on the ftp servers. Maybe it takes a while. Oh well.
>         We can store some binaries on denemo.org then.
>         
>         Jeremiah
>         
>         On May 12, 2013 8:20 AM, "Jeremiah Benham"
>         <address@hidden> wrote:
>                 I will do that tonight.
>                 
>                 Jeremiah
>                 
>                 On May 12, 2013 6:01 AM, "Richard Shann"
>                 <address@hidden> wrote:
>                         On Sat, 2013-05-11 at 20:47 +0200, Federico
>                         Bruni wrote:
>                         >
>                         > 2013/5/7 Richard Shann
>                         <address@hidden>
>                         >         I have tested the
>                         >
>                         http://denemo.org/downloads/denemo-1.0.2.tar.gz and it
>                         >         builds and executes - it defaults to
>                         expecting lilypond to be
>                         >         installed
>                         >         along with denemo, which is won't be
>                         the case if someone is
>                         >         building
>                         >         from the tarball, usually. I don't
>                         think we should hold up the
>                         >         release
>                         >         for that, though.
>                         >         Can someone test the translations
>                         are working?
>                         >
>                         > italian trannslation is working fine
>                         
>                         So I think we are ready to release 1.0.2
>                         Jeremiah - can you move and sign the tarball
>                         linux.exe and mingw.exe to
>                         ftp.gnu.org? If the darwin .exe is delayed
>                         that doesn't need to hold up
>                         the release.
>                         
>                         Richard
>                         
>                         
> 
>