Re: [Denemo-devel] testing denemo 0.9.4

[Richard Shann]

On Fri, 2012-03-02 at 10:25 -0600, Jeremiah Benham wrote:
> On 03/02/2012 06:41 AM, Richard Shann wrote:
> > On Thu, 2012-03-01 at 08:55 -0600, Jeremiah Benham wrote:
> >> On 03/01/2012 02:33 AM, Richard Shann wrote:
> >>> Jeremiah - did this appear on the m/l (and/or did you get to see it?)
> >> I did not see anything from you. I only saw the email that I sent and
> >> the reply you made to this email with thread named:
> >>
> >> [Denemo-devel] 0.9.4rc1 tarball for testing
> >>> I think you may have forgotten to
> >>> git add denemo_file_update.sh
> >> No. Its in the stable-0.9.4 branch and should be in the tarball. I have
> >> not had time to test the tarball yet.
> >>
> >>> as I don't see anything in git about it.
> >> Thats because its in the 0.9.4 branch.
> > ah, I see
> >> Do you want it in master? I
> >> though only 0.9.4 would be the transitional release.
> > yes, that's fine, it won't be useful after 0.9.4, indeed it would be
> > confusing.
> >
> >>> The other problem, libporttime, I don't know about...
> >> I am confused. Maybe lack of sleep. What are you referring to?
> > I was referring to the problem reported by Sebastian (see below) which
> > evidently didn't get sent to the m/l. I would guess that pkg-config
> > reports -lporttime for libportmidi, and (judging from what he says) that
> > it is not actually required by any call we make to libportmidi, and so
> > he was able to delete it from configure and get a build.
> > If that is right, I don't know if there is anything we can do about it.
> > The user would need to set PORTMIDI_LIBS themselves (or whatever it is
> > called) to stop pkg-config trying to do the job.
> 
> Unfortunately portmidi does not have a pkg-config file. I have to tell 
> autotools to search the library for the functions needed if in porttime 
> add -lporttime to LIBS. I pushed this change to master and stable-0.9.4. 
> I hope this works for everyone. Should I create a new tarball for this?

yes, unless you are anticipating further feedback that can be rolled
into one - I too haven't succeeded in organizing other testing of it.

Richard



> 
> Jeremiah
> 
> 
> >
> > Richard
> >
> >
> >
> >> Jeremiah
> >>
> >>> Richard
> >>> On Wed, 2012-02-29 at 21:07 +0000, Sebastian wrote:
> >>>> couple of things:
> >>>> on my (fedora 16) linux, libporttime doesn'tr exist: aparrently newer 
> >>>> versions
> >>>> have the code from libporttime incorporated in libportmidi.
> >>>> I fixed this by removing -lporttime from configure.in but that's 
> >>>> probably not
> >>>> the correct solution (I don't understand autotools).
> >>>>
> >>>> Also, make install fails like this:
> >>>> ...
> >>>> make[1]: Entering directory `/home/seb/src/denemo'
> >>>> make[1]: *** No rule to make target `denemo_file_update.sh', needed by
> >>>> `all-am'.  Stop.
> >>>> make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/seb/src/denemo'
> >>>> make: *** [install-recursive] Error 1
> >>>>
> >>>> Otherwise, thank you for keeping at it
> >>>>
> >>>> Seb
> >>>>
> >>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>     Message sent via/by Savannah
> >>>>     http://savannah.gnu.org/
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> Denemo-devel mailing list
> >>> address@hidden
> >>> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/denemo-devel
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Denemo-devel mailing list
> >> address@hidden
> >> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/denemo-devel
> >
>