Re: [Denemo-devel] The release branch

[Nils Gey]

As a sidenote: In the future I will be able to build gub from a denemo branch. 
In fact I already did it just now.

Nils

On Sat, 16 Oct 2010 12:51:12 -0500
Jeremiah Benham <address@hidden> wrote:

> 
> 
> On Oct 16, 2010, at 12:34 PM, Nils Gey <address@hidden> wrote:
> 
> > The fixes are in stable-0.8.20
> > Windows-build is ready.
> >
> > Jeremiah, could you create the release tarball now, please?
> 
> When I get home from work.
> 
> > Maybe you could tell me what is needed to do that, too?
> 
> To create the tarball:
> make clean;
> ./autogen.sh
> make dist
> 
> Then the FTP instructions:
> 
> http://www.gnu.org/prep/maintain/html_node/Automated-Upload-Procedure.html
> 
> > I notice the tarball has other files and dirs than git.
> 
> Which? Maybe they are added by autotools.
> 
> Jeremiah
> 
> 
> 
> >
> > greetings,
> >
> > Nils
> >
> >
> > On Sat, 16 Oct 2010 16:29:49 +0100
> > Richard Shann <address@hidden> wrote:
> >
> >> As we have had a showstopper bug to fix, I have taken the  
> >> opportunity to
> >> fix the spurious includes of lyparserfuncs.h so that the Master  
> >> branch
> >> should now be good.
> >> Aligning the stable-0.8.20 with the master branch will mean reverting
> >> the change to src/Makefile.am and merging the changes.
> >> Is that ok?
> >> Richard
> >>
> >> On Sat, 2010-10-16 at 08:47 -0500, Jeremiah Benham wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On Oct 16, 2010, at 3:02 AM, Richard Shann  
> >>> <address@hidden>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Jeremiah, Nils
> >>>> I see that you had to re-instate lyparserfuncs.h, presumably  
> >>>> because I
> >>>> forgot to delete includes of it from the various files when I  
> >>>> removed
> >>>> the old parser.
> >>>
> >>> Yeah. I added into the tarball. I could not compile the tarball
> >>> without including it. If it's supposed to left out I will change  
> >>> that
> >>> (making sure it compiles) then and remove it from git.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> The puzzle then is, how did clean builds work - in
> >>>> particular windows gub?
> >>>
> >>> Pulling from git provides the file. A tarball created with make dist
> >>> does not because the file was not mentioned in src/Makefile.am.
> >>>
> >>> Jeremiah
> >>>
> >>>> I would like to avoid re-building the windows
> >>>> executable, as it will need re-testing. I am not proposing that  
> >>>> we be
> >>>> impossibly fussy here - there are no actual changes of source code
> >>>> here,
> >>>> just how you build from source. Executables are unaltered.
> >>>>
> >>>> So if you can verify that the sources labelled 0.8.20 do build
> >>>> correctly
> >>>> on both platforms we are ready to release on Wednesday next, with  
> >>>> the
> >>>> already-built-and-tested windows executable. (This executable  
> >>>> will not
> >>>> be different if re-built, since the include file must have been
> >>>> present,
> >>>> and it would in any case not affect the resultant binary).
> >>>>
> >>>> I have some very good progress to check in now if you can move
> >>>> master on
> >>>> to 0.8.21, Anacrusis displaying properly, Breve, Longa and whole
> >>>> measure
> >>>> rests, even plain chant all doing the right thing in the Denemo
> >>>> display
> >>>> *and* the LilyPond!
> >>>>
> >>>> Richard
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>> Denemo-devel mailing list
> >>>> address@hidden
> >>>> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/denemo-devel
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Denemo-devel mailing list
> >> address@hidden
> >> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/denemo-devel
> >>
>