[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Demexp-dev] Re: Problème avec le dépôt mercurial
From: |
GISQUET Christophe |
Subject: |
[Demexp-dev] Re: Problème avec le dépôt mercurial |
Date: |
Wed, 13 Sep 2006 00:27:05 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 1.5.0.5 (Windows/20060719) |
Good evening.
By the way, I'm registered to demexp-dev so no more need to cc me.
David MENTRE a écrit :
> You'd better use demexp-dev@ for all questions related to development.
Ok, I thought it had more to do with project organization. But whatever.
> Are you sure? Have you tested with Firefox? Be careful that sometimes
> Firefox uncompresses tarballs while keeping the .tar.gz suffix.
>
> I tested with wget and it seems to work:
> wget
'http://www.linux-france.org/cgi-bin/hgwebdir.cgi/demexp/latest-dev?ca=tip;type=gz'
>
> With Firefox, I observe the sam behaviour as yours.
Yes, indeed. I find it surprising that Firefox uncompresses the archive
without telling us *and* keeps the same filename. But whathever, nowadays'
hard drives are so big that size shouldn't matter. *g*
> Once again, it works with a wget:
> wget
'http://www.linux-france.org/cgi-bin/hgwebdir.cgi/demexp/latest-dev?ca=tip;type=zip'
Indeed, on a Debian sarge, it is a valid zip file. But wget'ing it on a
windows host shows it to be the already mentioned directory listing.
> Oh, it reminds me of a discussion on Mercurial dev list where developers
> were thinking of changing MIME type announced for archive download
> because it had the above observed strange behaviour on Firefox. Maybe
At least, it had me chuckle.
> latest stable release fixes that? I'll try to test it.
Tested with firefox 2.0b2/win32 on my side (I know you are speaking of the
mercurial's version).
Best regards,
--
Christophe GISQUET