Re: Few improvements for androideabi board

[Alexander Ivchenko]

>   While I like the idea of the 'cross' code going into a later patch,
> It's not a big deal either way, so yeah, it's ok. Did you file a
> copyright assignment with the FSF ?

Thanks! Yes, I signed it and it's been sent to FSF ~7 monthes ago..



--Alexander


2013/10/18 Rob Savoye <address@hidden>:
> On 10/15/2013 07:26 AM, Alexander Ivchenko wrote:
>
>> The "cross" addition in DejaGNU and the correspoding change in the
>> test itself ({ target native cross }) would allow us to run them.
>> Defining cross as '1' in androideabi
>> board is not a very pretty solution, but I don't see others now..
>
>   Much of the board support code in DejaGnu isn't very pretty either. At
> least these days we're not still having to download srecords at 9600 baud...
>
>> Well, not in that matter. The problem with the permissions depends on
>> the image; Some images unset the executable bit during pushing through
>> adb. So in order to avoid that we added this check.
>
>   Makes sense.
>
>> Thanks, I attached the updated version.
>> Is it OK?
>
>   While I like the idea of the 'cross' code going into a later patch,
> It's not a big deal either way, so yeah, it's ok. Did you file a
> copyright assignment with the FSF ?
>
>         - rob -
>