[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: honoring gcc test stack size
From: |
Hans-Peter Nilsson |
Subject: |
Re: honoring gcc test stack size |
Date: |
Wed, 13 Feb 2008 17:35:40 +0100 |
> Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 10:12:45 -0600
> From: Joel Sherrill <address@hidden>
> Would it make sense in the future as a (beginner?)
> GCC project to let me generate a set of GCC testresults
> and let someone see which tests have issues honoring
> the stack size.
>
> (Run 1) Run with a small 2-8K stack.
> (Run 2) Run with 256K or 512K stack and print stack
> usage via an atexit() function.
I'd suggest something like 64M (large enough to PASS most hungry
tests, but doesn't oom your machine), 512K is still a bit small.
> What passed in Run 2 but fails in Run 1 has a stack issue
> and the report in Run 2's log would show the peak.
>
> Repeat until the runs have the same results.
>
> Would that be useful?
Yes, I think so.
brgds, H-P
- honoring gcc test stack size, Joel Sherrill, 2008/02/12
- Re: honoring gcc test stack size, Hans-Peter Nilsson, 2008/02/12
- Re: honoring gcc test stack size, Joel Sherrill, 2008/02/12
- Re: honoring gcc test stack size, Joel Sherrill, 2008/02/13
- Re: honoring gcc test stack size,
Hans-Peter Nilsson <=
- Re: honoring gcc test stack size, Joel Sherrill, 2008/02/13
- Re: honoring gcc test stack size, Hans-Peter Nilsson, 2008/02/13
- Re: honoring gcc test stack size, Joel Sherrill, 2008/02/13
- Re: honoring gcc test stack size, Hans-Peter Nilsson, 2008/02/13
- RE: honoring gcc test stack size, Dave Korn, 2008/02/13
- Re: honoring gcc test stack size, Hans-Peter Nilsson, 2008/02/13