[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Master sources?
From: |
Daniel Jacobowitz |
Subject: |
Re: Master sources? |
Date: |
Mon, 9 Jun 2003 20:23:38 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.1i |
On Mon, Jun 09, 2003 at 05:18:25PM -0700, Dan Kegel wrote:
> Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> >On Mon, Jun 09, 2003 at 05:04:56PM -0700, Dan Kegel wrote:
> >>According to http://www.gnu.org/software/dejagnu/
> >>the master sources are kept at savannah.gnu.org.
> >>
> >>I was therefore somewhat dismayed to read that this isn't
> >>quite the case --
> >>http://mail.gnu.org/archive/html/dejagnu/2003-06/msg00015.html
> >>states there's also a repository at sources.redhat.com.
> >>
> >>Why are there two?
> >
> >The one at sources isn't the master. It does, however, get a lot of
> >the active changes.
>
> If those active changes don't also go to savannah, then savannah isn't
> really the master, is it?
> Also, if anyone is pulling from sources.redhat.com, then savannah
> isn't really the master, is it?
>
> Who uses the repository at sources.redhat.com, and why?
Everyone who tests combined trees from sources.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer
Re: Master sources?, Rob Savoye, 2003/06/09
Re: Master sources?, Rob Savoye, 2003/06/09