Re: ddd & bonobo - ps

[horos]

> 
> > oh, I didn't know that. I sort of just assumed that ada would lag behind the
> > development cycle. (I guess it shows my prejudices.)
> 
> No problem, mailing lists are also here for information.
> 
> > However, I still think that ddd should bonobize itself. Probably a stupid 
> > question, but if bonobo components are so easy to write in ada, what makes
> > bonobo components based on motif so difficult?
> 
> It is not really a matter of language, it is more a matter of
> proper structuring of a software.
> 
> GVD has been written with modularity in mind from the start.

Right, and I guess my point would be that if it isn't like that already, ddd
should be written/(re)written with this in mind (btw.. is there a gtk+ port
of ddd planned?). IMO, components are simply the way to go, they allow the most 
freedom of use from the point of the user.

Ed