[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Dchub-dev] [patch #2329] [Patch #2329] missing hub-diffs for patch 2270
From: |
noreply |
Subject: |
[Dchub-dev] [patch #2329] [Patch #2329] missing hub-diffs for patch 2270 |
Date: |
Sat, 22 Nov 2003 08:04:24 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.0) |
Patch #2329 has been updated.
Project:
Category: None
Status: Closed
Summary: missing hub-diffs for patch 2270
Follow-Ups:
Date: Sat 11/22/03 at 07:02
By: ericprev
Comment:
I have partially applied the patch. I have not modified plugin_nick_type to
return -1 instead of 0 because when a user does not exist in the database, it
does not mean it is an error (-1), this means it is a normal user (level=0)
-------------------------------------------------------
Date: Sat 11/22/03 at 09:35
By: blusseau
Comment:
Level -1 is used to disable an account.
-------------------------------------------------------
Date: Sat 11/22/03 at 10:25
By: hhgoth
Comment:
so maybe we need an other possibility to differ registered and unregistered
users, for registered-user-commands...
but I think where's no problem to use -1 or an other negative value as default
- both are < 0 and therefore not able e.g. to use the +passwd command
-------------------------------------------------------
Date: Sat 11/22/03 at 11:41
By: blusseau
Comment:
unregistered users are those that don't have an entry in the users.xml file
-------------------------------------------------------
Date: Sat 11/22/03 at 11:58
By: hhgoth
Comment:
I know, but if it's possible I didn't want to call so many hub-funktions
directly to retrieve the wanted result, and setting an default=0 whitch is also
valid for registered users is no good idea as well - why we don't use the
opposite to the MASTER level... -32767 as default ?
-------------------------------------------------------
Date: Sat 11/22/03 at 12:41
By: blusseau
Comment:
You don't have another level for unregister user.
If you use the xml_get_user function, it return TRUE if the user exist FALSE
otherwise. It's the good method to know if a user is register or not.
-------------------------------------------------------
Date: Sat 11/22/03 at 13:04
By: hhgoth
Comment:
I won't give any more comment to this, and change this in my version only.
I just tried to make the handling easier Yves, but I can't help you if you want
to handle some functions with two hub-function-calls instead of one...
-------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------
For more info, visit:
http://savannah.nongnu.org/patch/?func=detailpatch&patch_id=2329&group_id=3963
_______________________________________________
Message sent via/by Savannah
http://savannah.nongnu.org/
- [Dchub-dev] [patch #2329] [Patch #2329] missing hub-diffs for patch 2270, noreply, 2003/11/21
- [Dchub-dev] [patch #2329] [Patch #2329] missing hub-diffs for patch 2270, noreply, 2003/11/22
- [Dchub-dev] [patch #2329] [Patch #2329] missing hub-diffs for patch 2270, noreply, 2003/11/22
- [Dchub-dev] [patch #2329] [Patch #2329] missing hub-diffs for patch 2270, noreply, 2003/11/22
- [Dchub-dev] [patch #2329] [Patch #2329] missing hub-diffs for patch 2270, noreply, 2003/11/22
- [Dchub-dev] [patch #2329] [Patch #2329] missing hub-diffs for patch 2270, noreply, 2003/11/22
- [Dchub-dev] [patch #2329] [Patch #2329] missing hub-diffs for patch 2270, noreply, 2003/11/22
- [Dchub-dev] [patch #2329] [Patch #2329] missing hub-diffs for patch 2270,
noreply <=
- [Dchub-dev] [patch #2329] [Patch #2329] missing hub-diffs for patch 2270, noreply, 2003/11/22