[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Dazuko-help] It is dead?
From: |
Frans de Boer |
Subject: |
Re: [Dazuko-help] It is dead? |
Date: |
Wed, 13 Oct 2010 20:22:05 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.12) Gecko/20100914 SUSE/3.0.8 Thunderbird/3.0.8 |
On 10/13/2010 10:41 AM, John Ogness wrote:
> Note: This email is being cross-posted to dazuko-devel since it
> contains relevant development information.
>
> On 2010-10-13, Frans de Boer <address@hidden> wrote:
>
>> No progress, no resolution for the 2.6.35+ kernel....is there a
>> change it will spark back to life or am I missing something?
>>
> The 2.6.36 kernel is about to be released. I don't plan on integrating
> the already publicly available DazukoFS patches into a new version
> until then. At that point I would also fix any new issues with 2.6.36.
>
> 2.6.36 is actually a very interesting kernel release because it will
> include (for the first time) the fanotify interface. Although the
> implementation is quite different, fanotify could be used as a
> replacement for DazukoFS. And since it is now mainline Linux, one must
> ask if DazukoFS should continue to exist.
>
> I plan on writing test applications using fanotify to demonstrate that
> fanotify can be a replacement for DazukoFS. If the applications indeed
> show this (which I assume they will), then I will officially orphan
> (or pass on maintenance of) DazukoFS (after fixing 2.6.36 issues).
>
> John Ogness
>
>
I know that ClamAV in the 0.97 release plan to use Fanotify instead of
dazukoFS. When a product has made it main stream, then why try to
continue if dazukoFS already has offered itself for inclusion in the
main stream. As far as I know, it did not even made it into the staging
area.
Anyhow, thanks sofar for given us dazuko and dazukoFS in the past.
Regards, Frans.