[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: bug#7489: [coreutils] over aggressive threads in sort
From: |
Pádraig Brady |
Subject: |
Re: bug#7489: [coreutils] over aggressive threads in sort |
Date: |
Sat, 27 Nov 2010 03:32:37 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 |
On 27/11/10 03:00, DJ Lucas wrote:
>
> Setting LANG/LC_ALL to C or
> POSIX works around it, as well as --parallel=1. I've added a quick and
> really ugly workaround in the interim so that I can continue and get
> some work done (using getenv("LC_COLLATE"), and testing only against !=
> POSIX and != C, setting nthreads=1). Confirmed that the correct encoding
> is displayed with --debug with the workaround in place.
Best workaround I think is to leave the code alone,
and set OMP_NUM_THREADS=1 in your env
as otherwise you may get invalid results
in any locale.
cheers,
Pádraig.
- [coreutils] over aggressive threads in sort, Pádraig Brady, 2010/11/22
- Re: [coreutils] over aggressive threads in sort, DJ Lucas, 2010/11/27
- Re: bug#7489: [coreutils] over aggressive threads in sort, Pádraig Brady, 2010/11/26
- Re: bug#7489: [coreutils] over aggressive threads in sort, Paul Eggert, 2010/11/27
- Re: bug#7489: [coreutils] over aggressive threads in sort, Paul Eggert, 2010/11/27
- Re: bug#7489: [coreutils] over aggressive threads in sort, Paul Eggert, 2010/11/27
- Re: bug#7489: [coreutils] over aggressive threads in sort, Pádraig Brady, 2010/11/27
- Re: bug#7489: [coreutils] over aggressive threads in sort, DJ Lucas, 2010/11/27
- Re: bug#7489: [coreutils] over aggressive threads in sort, DJ Lucas, 2010/11/29
- Re: bug#7489: [coreutils] over aggressive threads in sort, Pádraig Brady, 2010/11/29
- Re: bug#7489: [coreutils] over aggressive threads in sort, Paul Eggert, 2010/11/29
- Re: bug#7489: [coreutils] over aggressive threads in sort, Jim Meyering, 2010/11/29