consensus
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[GNU/consensus] metricking SocialNetwork freedom featurings


From: flawer
Subject: [GNU/consensus] metricking SocialNetwork freedom featurings
Date: Tue, 03 Sep 2013 19:29:15 +0200
User-agent: Roundcube Webmail/0.7.2

ei his.


i am about to engage 'again' a table with pareters valueing featurings from 0-10 points. I'm looking ideally to have 10 parameters with a conceptual title, perhaps splitting them afterwards in 2 (0-5 points) or 5 (0-2 points) subparameters. The explain or needed specific features for each would be explained in the table legend.

and then cross specific ongoing and planned projects and qualify them with this points.


the other point nice to previously analize is that i am valueing the 'backstage' (or protocols) of the concret software project in another table. the shareability of the data in another. the economic featuring in another. and the ecologism (this may be irrelevant here) in another. so no need to care about these sides for this table.


i should admit that i don't know yet if this qualifications could later apply to other thing apart of software, but ideally i'd like it. it'd would be like calculating the sociability featuring of a community, apart of how free the project is in itself (although this 2 could share some parameter or as shown below backstage freedom to be a sociability parameter apart of having a full table for itself). so back to basics, and thinking in plain software features, if you'd like to dump something here that's ok.



some example:

grouping: diaspora 1 point, n-1.cc 4 points (or 5)



grouping legend:

1-allows nodes relations

2-allows nodes moderated relations

3-allows groups

4-allow subgroups

5-allow subgroups and groups moderated relations



discussion:

post to group, post to collection of friends, forum feature rich, mailinglist, etc




federation:

I like, RSS, ostatus, etc




privacy options:

permissions, permission per grups, custom groups permissions, gpg, etc



thematism:  (content aggrupation)

etc



personal data management:

etc



backstage freedom: (see this other table)



security:

cake to break, hard, etc



usability:

accesibility, server loading, notifiability, taste, etc



more featurings:

etc



*******

example doubt: follower, friend, friend of friend, etc featuring belongs to federation(+0) or to grouping (+1)?

etc


**

I don't promise doing a big job for now, i am just willing to play a little for now. it's not that far to get something fair decent i guess.



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]