[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[hurd, commited] bsd unlockpt: unlockpt needs to fail with EINVAL, not E
From: |
Samuel Thibault |
Subject: |
[hurd, commited] bsd unlockpt: unlockpt needs to fail with EINVAL, not ENOTTY |
Date: |
Sun, 8 Nov 2020 15:11:19 +0100 |
The EINVAL error code is mandated by POSIX, while ptsname_r returns
ENOTTY, so we need to translate.
---
sysdeps/unix/bsd/unlockpt.c | 7 ++++++-
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/sysdeps/unix/bsd/unlockpt.c b/sysdeps/unix/bsd/unlockpt.c
index d8b7f0cae7..e609685c2f 100644
--- a/sysdeps/unix/bsd/unlockpt.c
+++ b/sysdeps/unix/bsd/unlockpt.c
@@ -20,6 +20,7 @@
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <string.h>
#include <unistd.h>
+#include <errno.h>
/* Unlock the slave pseudo terminal associated with the master pseudo
@@ -31,6 +32,10 @@ unlockpt (int fd)
/* BSD doesn't have a lock, but it does have `revoke'. */
if (__ptsname_r (fd, buf, sizeof (buf)))
- return -1;
+ {
+ if (errno == ENOTTY)
+ __set_errno (EINVAL);
+ return -1;
+ }
return __revoke (buf);
}
--
2.28.0
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- [hurd, commited] bsd unlockpt: unlockpt needs to fail with EINVAL, not ENOTTY,
Samuel Thibault <=