Re: gtk-peer compile fixes for gcc-2.95

[Archie Cobbs]

Mark Wielaard wrote:
> > Now, back to my other question: why not just get rid of _POSIX_SOURCE?
> > That seems to solve the problem in all cases (unless I'm confused, which
> > is probably the case :-)
> 
> No, you seem to get it. I was confused during some of my earlier
> experiments. gcc sets the POSIX_VERSION when -std=c89 is in effect which
> is why I thought I needed _POSIX_SOURCE. I am running some more tests,
> but it seems you are right the we only need _BSD_SOURCE.

Cool.. thanks for making these unglamorous but important changes.

-Archie

__________________________________________________________________________
Archie Cobbs      *        CTO, Awarix        *      http://www.awarix.com