[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: classpath bugzilla question
From: |
Mark Wielaard |
Subject: |
Re: classpath bugzilla question |
Date: |
Thu, 25 Aug 2005 00:24:02 +0200 |
Hi,
On Fri, 2005-08-19 at 11:33 -0600, Tom Tromey wrote:
> I notice that the classpath bugzilla doesn't have target milestones.
> And, the 'reported against' field doesn't list current cvs in any way.
>
> I would like to suggest that we always list the next release in both
> the 'reported against' and 'target milestone' fields, e.g. right now
> both of these fields (among their other choices) would show 0.18.
>
> For reporting, this means folks can more accurately indicate what
> version they are using.
>
> For target milestone, I think we should do what gcc does, and set this
> field when we close the PR. That way we can later easily run a query
> to see what bugs were fixed in a given release.
Good idea. I added 0.18 as target milestone (the only one for this
moment, will update after the release). And changed the CVS version
number to 0.18-pre (was 0.17+cvs).
2005-08-24 Mark Wielaard <address@hidden>
* configure.ac: Set version to 0.18-pre.
Cheers,
Mark
--- configure.ac 24 Aug 2005 08:36:39 -0000 1.102
+++ configure.ac 24 Aug 2005 22:22:57 -0000
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
dnl define([AC_CACHE_LOAD], )dnl
dnl define([AC_CACHE_SAVE], )dnl
-AC_INIT([GNU Classpath],[0.17+cvs],address@hidden,[classpath])
+AC_INIT([GNU Classpath],[0.18-pre],address@hidden,[classpath])
AC_CONFIG_SRCDIR(java/lang/System.java)
AC_CANONICAL_TARGET
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part