[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Mono-list] Re: The Mauve unicode testcase and VM performance
From: |
Ben Maurer |
Subject: |
Re: [Mono-list] Re: The Mauve unicode testcase and VM performance |
Date: |
Thu, 15 Apr 2004 08:04:04 -0400 |
No, he is not.
YOu can run
mono -O=shared my.exe
or, if you would like to aot:
mono -O=shared --aot my.exe
However, as miguel stated earlier, the need for shared code is very
rare. What shared means here is that the same code can be used by
multiple appdomains (look that up if you are not familar with the .NET
appdomain system). The use of this functionality is pretty rare, the
only example I can think of is ASP.net.
-- Ben
>>> Anthony Green <address@hidden> 04/15/04 04:21 AM >>>
On Tue, 2004-04-13 at 15:08, Jonathan Pryor wrote:
> AOT (or pre-JITing) assemblies is not as useful as you'd think. It
has
> two primary effects:
>
> - Reduce memory requirements, as memory doesn't need to be allocated
> for the JITed code
> - Decrease startup time, as (again) the JITing doesn't need to be
> done.
Are you saying that mono doesn't have the ability to create shared
libraries?
AG
--
Anthony Green <address@hidden>
Red Hat, Inc.
_______________________________________________
Mono-list maillist - address@hidden
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- Re: [Mono-list] Re: The Mauve unicode testcase and VM performance,
Ben Maurer <=