[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: question about serialization
From: |
Mark Wielaard |
Subject: |
Re: question about serialization |
Date: |
05 Aug 2003 21:19:01 +0200 |
Hi,
On Tue, 2003-08-05 at 20:50, Tom Tromey wrote:
> I assume you are doing this because your Class implementation caches
> the Field and Method objects. I don't think that is valid. If we
> call setAccessible on a Method, then even if we reset it we are
> opening up a window where other unprivileged code could access that
> Method. This can only happen in the serialization code if Class
> returns the same Method or Field object to other callers.
It is not valid, but the vm reference classes of GNU Classpath do
suggest this wrong optimization. I just added a couple of tests to Mauve
to check that this optimization isn't made.
Cheers,
Mark
- Re: question about serialization, David P Grove, 2003/08/03
- Re: question about serialization, Tom Tromey, 2003/08/02
- Re: question about serialization, Bryce McKinlay, 2003/08/04
- Re: question about serialization, Chris Gray, 2003/08/04
- Re: question about serialization, Bryce McKinlay, 2003/08/04
- Re: question about serialization, Chris Gray, 2003/08/04
- Re: question about serialization, Bryce McKinlay, 2003/08/04
- Re: question about serialization, Tom Tromey, 2003/08/04
- Re: question about serialization, Ingo Prötel, 2003/08/05
- Re: question about serialization, Tom Tromey, 2003/08/05
- Re: question about serialization,
Mark Wielaard <=
- Re: question about serialization, Chris Gray, 2003/08/05