[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [cp-patches] RFC: prevent URL degeneration
From: |
Mark Wielaard |
Subject: |
RE: [cp-patches] RFC: prevent URL degeneration |
Date: |
Mon, 10 Oct 2005 13:22:02 +0200 |
Hi Jeroen,
On Mon, 2005-10-10 at 09:38 +0200, Jeroen Frijters wrote:
> I also disagree with it on principle grounds. We should match the JDK in
> cases like this, not try to do the "right thing". It's very easy to
> break applications that depend on the JDK URL implementation and it is
> not reasonable to expect them to be fixed if the JDK is never going to
> get fixed (which I can assure you, it isn't).
I agree that we should be careful not to break applications. But the
fact is that it is a real bug where code expects new URL("user supplied
string representation").toString() to provide a valid URL that
represents the URL the user wanted which can again be used to create a
similar URL (like in the original code Robert found). Maybe it is too
hard to provide a correct fix, but we can at least try to do better.
Cheers,
Mark
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
- Re: [cp-patches] RFC: prevent URL degeneration - v2b, (continued)
- Re: [cp-patches] RFC: prevent URL degeneration - v2b, Chris Burdess, 2005/10/10
- Re: [cp-patches] RFC: prevent URL degeneration - v2b, Mark Wielaard, 2005/10/10
- Re: [cp-patches] RFC: prevent URL degeneration - v3, Robert Schuster, 2005/10/10
- Re: [cp-patches] RFC: prevent URL degeneration - v3, Robert Schuster, 2005/10/13
- Re: [cp-patches] RFC: prevent URL degeneration - v3, Mark Wielaard, 2005/10/14
- Re: [cp-patches] RFC: prevent URL degeneration - v3, Mark Wielaard, 2005/10/14
Re: [cp-patches] RFC: prevent URL degeneration, Chris Burdess, 2005/10/10
RE: [cp-patches] RFC: prevent URL degeneration, Jeroen Frijters, 2005/10/10