classpath-patches
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [cp-patches] [Patch] import cleanup


From: Mark Wielaard
Subject: Re: [cp-patches] [Patch] import cleanup
Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2004 23:10:58 +0200

Hi,

On Wed, 2004-10-13 at 16:33, Michael Koch wrote:
> I just commited the attached patch to cleanup some import statements all
> over gnu.* packages. This patch was influenced by patch #3128. Thanks to
> Nikolay Fiykov.
> [...]

> diff -u -r1.2 StubDelegateImpl.java
> --- gnu/javax/rmi/CORBA/StubDelegateImpl.java   29 Jul 2004 06:12:04 -0000    
>   1.2
> +++ gnu/javax/rmi/CORBA/StubDelegateImpl.java   13 Oct 2004 14:31:05 -0000
> @@ -41,17 +41,9 @@
>  import java.io.IOException;
>  import java.io.ObjectInputStream;
>  import java.io.ObjectOutputStream;
> -//import org.omg.CORBA.portable.Delegate;
> -//import org.omg.CORBA.portable.InputStream;
> -//import org.omg.CORBA.portable.OutputStream;
> -//import org.omg.CORBA_2_3.portable.ObjectImpl;
> -//import org.omg.CORBA.portable.ObjectImpl;
> -//import org.omg.CORBA.BAD_OPERATION;
> -//import org.omg.CORBA.ORB;
>  import java.rmi.RemoteException;
>  import javax.rmi.CORBA.Stub;
>  import javax.rmi.CORBA.StubDelegate;
> -import javax.rmi.CORBA.Tie;

Note that these commented out imports indicated that this class was
mostly bogus. It was probably my mistake to check it in.
Jeff said he wanted to work on the Corba stuff, but maybe it is better
to remove these bogus classes for now. What do you think?

Cheers,

Mark

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]