[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Chicken-users] for those who have interest in procedure objects dec

From: Marco Maggi
Subject: Re: [Chicken-users] for those who have interest in procedure objects decoration
Date: Wed, 22 May 2019 15:05:44 +0200

Peter Bex wrote:

> On Wed, May 22, 2019 at 10:59:17AM +0200, Marco Maggi wrote:
>> Ciao,

>>   I'm composing unofficial documentation  for CHICKEN internals that are
>> usable from client code.   As part of this I have  added a section about
>> decorating procedure objects:

>> <>

> Hi Marco,

> This looks pretty cool!  One request though: could you please add some
> blatant warnings that this stuff is not meant to be relied upon in user
> code?  These are internals instead of an official API for a reason; we
> can change them at will (this has happened in the past, and will happen
> in the future).

Yes.  I will add it in the document overview.

> So it's acceptable to use these, but only if there's no alternative, and
> you may end up having to use cond-expand for various different versions.

Speaking of which!  "chicken-doc" does not know about COND-EXPAND! I get
a blank page when I try it (the same with UNQUOTE and UNQUOTE-SPLICING).
Marco Maggi

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]