[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-users] for those who have interest in procedure objects dec
Re: [Chicken-users] for those who have interest in procedure objects decoration
Wed, 22 May 2019 15:05:44 +0200
Peter Bex wrote:
> On Wed, May 22, 2019 at 10:59:17AM +0200, Marco Maggi wrote:
>> I'm composing unofficial documentation for CHICKEN internals that are
>> usable from client code. As part of this I have added a section about
>> decorating procedure objects:
> Hi Marco,
> This looks pretty cool! One request though: could you please add some
> blatant warnings that this stuff is not meant to be relied upon in user
> code? These are internals instead of an official API for a reason; we
> can change them at will (this has happened in the past, and will happen
> in the future).
Yes. I will add it in the document overview.
> So it's acceptable to use these, but only if there's no alternative, and
> you may end up having to use cond-expand for various different versions.
Speaking of which! "chicken-doc" does not know about COND-EXPAND! I get
a blank page when I try it (the same with UNQUOTE and UNQUOTE-SPLICING).