[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Chicken-users] Coroutines and Finite State Machines Egg

From: Robert Smiley
Subject: Re: [Chicken-users] Coroutines and Finite State Machines Egg
Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2016 13:36:52 -0600

Thanks for catching that, I did not realize my replies were not going to the mailing list. I've renamed the source file to cooperative.scm and made the necessary changes to the setup and release-info files. The release is now 0.1.1 and 0.1.0 has been removed from cooperative.release-info. Thanks for the feedback.

On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 12:46 PM, Mario Domenech Goulart <address@hidden> wrote:
Hello Robert,

On Wed, 15 Jun 2016 12:33:35 -0600 Robert Smiley <address@hidden> wrote:

> Oh. I read a tutorial a while back which showed giving the code an .
> import.scm extension as a way of allowing one to easily import code
> from the current directory when testing, be it interpreted or
> compiled. I didn't realize that was abnormal. Should I change it to
> have the .scm extension instead?

Yes, please.  You can use -J to make csc generate the import library
(which is usually compiled too).  Take a look at some eggs' .setup files
for examples.

Also note that you'll either have to move the current tag or create a
new one.  If you decide for the latter, please remove the 0.1.0 release
from .release-info.

P.S.: your message was not sent to the mailing list.  Don't know if it
was intentional or not.  In any case, feel free to reply to the list.

All the best.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]