[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Chicken-users] A (somewhat) useful define-syntax example

From: John Cowan
Subject: Re: [Chicken-users] A (somewhat) useful define-syntax example
Date: Sun, 26 Apr 2015 18:23:08 -0400
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)

Dan Leslie scripsit:

> Earlier last week a bug was reported with the monad egg, and it exposed
> a deep flaw in how the syntax was written. In trying to fix it I found
> myself spinning my wheels and generally having a frustrating time of
> it. Thus, I took it upon myself to strip the concepts to their minimal
> and write a small example of the behaviour I wanted.

OT: I looked at this egg for the first time and noted that the syntax
forms were marked [procedure], so I fixed the markup on the wiki.

John Cowan        address@hidden
How comes city and country to be filled with drones and rogues, our highways
with hackers, and all places with sloth and wickedness?
                --W. Blith, Eng. Improver Improved, 1652

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]