Re: [Chicken-users] bug update-uri in uri-common

[Andy Bennett]

Hi,

> If anyone on this mailinglist has strong opinions either way, please let
> yourselves be heard: now's the time to speak up.

If there was a vote then I'd vote to preserve an explicit port setting but 
dynamically choose the correct one, based on "scheme", when port is #f.

I don't think we (Knodium) rely on the current behaviour.

We do use the "domain canonicalisation" examples: 
http://api.call-cc.org/doc/spiffy#sec:Redirecting_to_another_domain
The latter one is reasonably robust in the face of both the current 
behaviour and KLM's proposed behaviour. The former one is not.





Regards,
@ndy

--
address@hidden
http://www.ashurst.eu.org/
0x7EBA75FF