[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-users] go routines for chicken
From: |
Moritz Heidkamp |
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-users] go routines for chicken |
Date: |
Thu, 28 Nov 2013 19:17:58 +0100 |
Daniel Leslie <address@hidden> writes:
> Go also enjoys a rather robust Channels system, which is sort of like
> Scheme's ports, only it's type-safe by design.
How are Scheme ports not type-safe? The main difference is that Scheme
ports are limited to just a single type (i.e. characters) but that
doesn't make them type-unsafe, no? :-)
Moritz
- Re: [Chicken-users] go routines for chicken, (continued)
Re: [Chicken-users] go routines for chicken, Moritz Heidkamp, 2013/11/27
- Re: [Chicken-users] go routines for chicken, mfv, 2013/11/27
- Re: [Chicken-users] go routines for chicken, mfv, 2013/11/27
- Re: [Chicken-users] go routines for chicken, Hugo Arregui, 2013/11/27
- Re: [Chicken-users] go routines for chicken, Jörg F. Wittenberger, 2013/11/27
- Re: [Chicken-users] go routines for chicken, Daniel Leslie, 2013/11/27
- Re: [Chicken-users] go routines for chicken,
Moritz Heidkamp <=
- Re: [Chicken-users] go routines for chicken, Daniel Leslie, 2013/11/28
- Re: [Chicken-users] go routines for chicken, Peter Bex, 2013/11/28
Re: [Chicken-users] go routines for chicken, John Cowan, 2013/11/27
Re: [Chicken-users] go routines for chicken, Moritz Heidkamp, 2013/11/28