[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-users] Alist versus Hash-table
From: |
Peter Bex |
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-users] Alist versus Hash-table |
Date: |
Tue, 12 Nov 2013 22:37:15 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4.2.3i |
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 04:34:51PM -0500, John Cowan wrote:
> > Also, in some cases duplicate entries really mean something different
> > (for example in alist->uri query attribute mappings and such).
>
> I don't understand this example.
((a . "foo") (a . "bar")) => ?a=foo;a=bar
A HTTP server might interpret this query string differently from ?a=foo
Cheers,
Peter
--
http://www.more-magic.net
- [Chicken-users] Alist versus Hash-table, Loïc Faure-Lacroix, 2013/11/12
- Re: [Chicken-users] Alist versus Hash-table, Christian Kellermann, 2013/11/12
- Re: [Chicken-users] Alist versus Hash-table, Jörg F. Wittenberger, 2013/11/12
- Re: [Chicken-users] Alist versus Hash-table, Peter Bex, 2013/11/12
- Re: [Chicken-users] Alist versus Hash-table, Loïc Faure-Lacroix, 2013/11/12
- Re: [Chicken-users] Alist versus Hash-table, John Cowan, 2013/11/12
- Re: [Chicken-users] Alist versus Hash-table, Peter Bex, 2013/11/12
- Re: [Chicken-users] Alist versus Hash-table, John Cowan, 2013/11/12
- Re: [Chicken-users] Alist versus Hash-table,
Peter Bex <=
- Re: [Chicken-users] Alist versus Hash-table, Loïc Faure-Lacroix, 2013/11/12
- Re: [Chicken-users] Alist versus Hash-table, John Cowan, 2013/11/12
- Re: [Chicken-users] Alist versus Hash-table, Peter Bex, 2013/11/13