[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-users] Building 32-bit chicken scheme on OS X
From: |
Jim Ursetto |
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-users] Building 32-bit chicken scheme on OS X |
Date: |
Mon, 15 Jul 2013 17:56:26 -0500 |
Hi there.
The culprit appears to be a bug in our use of sigsetjmp, which is actually
already fixed in recent stability/4.8.0 (after 4.8.0.3) but is as yet
unreleased. I verified 32-bit builds now work on a 64-bit Mac.
If anyone has a 32-bit Mac (for example, an original Core Duo) could you verify
it works on your system as well? You will need to build stability/4.8.0 from
git, or I can make a tarball if you aren't set up to build from git.
Jim
(P.S. On a 32-bit system it is redundant to add any options like ARCH or
*_OPTIONS; `make PLATFORM=macosx` will suffice.)
On Jan 11, 2013, at 2:21 AM, Daniel P. Wright <address@hidden> wrote:
> Jim Ursetto (Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 12:20:05PM -0600) >>
>> Dani,
>>
>> ASSEMBLER_OPTIONS is missing:
>>
>> make PLATFORM=macosx ARCH=x86 C_COMPILER_OPTIONS="-no-cpp-precomp
>> -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -fno-common -DHAVE_CHICKEN_CONFIG_H -m32"
>> ASSEMBLER_OPTIONS="-m32" LINKER_OPTIONS="-m32"
>
> Seems obvious now you mention it! Thanks, I also managed to build
> successfully with these build options. But,
>
>> The resulting chicken gives me a bus error though and I don't know how to
>> fix that.
>
> Me too.
>
> I have had the same bus error when building chicken on an old os x
> machine without specifying ARCH=x86-64, which I think was defaulting to
> a 32-bit build. Perhaps 32-bit builds just don't play nicely on 64-bit
> macs? I don't suppose it's a common use-case.
>
> Thanks for your input! I guess I'll look into it a little further and
> see if I can get anywhere with it. What is a bus error?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Dani.
- Re: [Chicken-users] Building 32-bit chicken scheme on OS X,
Jim Ursetto <=