[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-users] representation of a procedure
|
From: |
Kon Lovett |
|
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-users] representation of a procedure |
|
Date: |
Thu, 27 Jun 2013 10:45:25 -0700 |
On Jun 27, 2013, at 9:52 AM, "Daniel Ajoy" <address@hidden> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is there a function that gives the content of a procedure (it's definition)?
The interpreter doesn't save the original s-expr & neither does the compiler.
Reflection facilities are slim.
You can recover, sometimes, the expected argument list. See:
http://api.call-cc.org/doc/library#sec:procedure-information
http://wiki.call-cc.org/eggref/4/srfi-102
>
> Daniel
>
> _______________________________________________
> Chicken-users mailing list
> address@hidden
> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users