[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Chicken-users] Different factorial results
From: |
Steve Graham |
Subject: |
[Chicken-users] Different factorial results |
Date: |
Fri, 3 Jun 2011 07:26:58 -0700 (PDT) |
In running (factorial 50)
(define (factorial n) (if (< n 2) 1 (* n (factorial (- n 1)))))
I found that Chicken Scheme's result differed from Petite Chez, Kawa and
Gambit. The former gave
3.04140932017134e+064
and the latter 3 gave
30414093201713378043612608166064768844377641568960512000000000000
Why the difference?
Steve
- [Chicken-users] Different factorial results,
Steve Graham <=
- Re: [Chicken-users] Different factorial results, Mario Domenech Goulart, 2011/06/03
- Re: [Chicken-users] Different factorial results, Steve Graham, 2011/06/03
- Re: [Chicken-users] Different factorial results, John Cowan, 2011/06/03
- Re: [Chicken-users] Different factorial results, Mario Domenech Goulart, 2011/06/03
- Re: [Chicken-users] Different factorial results, Kon Lovett, 2011/06/03
- Re: [Chicken-users] Different factorial results, Peter Bex, 2011/06/03
- Re: [Chicken-users] Different factorial results, Alex Queiroz, 2011/06/03
- Re: [Chicken-users] Different factorial results, Steve Graham, 2011/06/03
- Re: [Chicken-users] Different factorial results, Jim Ursetto, 2011/06/03