[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-users] Possible numbers bug
From: |
Christian Kellermann |
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-users] Possible numbers bug |
Date: |
Fri, 27 May 2011 11:29:57 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
* Peter Lane <address@hidden> [110527 11:28]:
> Hi Dominic,
>
> On 27 May 2011 09:58, Dominic Pearson <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> > I am trying to compute the sum i = 0 to n where n = 1000 of n^n, but
> > chicken seems to return the incorrect answer.
> >
> > http://paste.call-cc.org/paste?id=e0884580a684d1220f3dedb819f63201b6f5eb1a
> >
> > Racket and scheme48 both seem to give different answers too.
> >
>
> Oddly enough, when I run your code (both versions), I get the same answer as
> you did for Racket. Also, the Ruby program below agrees with *my* Chicken
> answer (and your Racket answer). (My computer here is a bit behind the times
> - this is on Chicken 4.6.2)
I forgot to add I am using a 64 bit linux machine for my tests.
- [Chicken-users] Possible numbers bug, Dominic Pearson, 2011/05/27
- Re: [Chicken-users] Possible numbers bug, Peter Lane, 2011/05/27
- Re: [Chicken-users] Possible numbers bug,
Christian Kellermann <=
- Re: [Chicken-users] Possible numbers bug, Christian Kellermann, 2011/05/27
- Re: [Chicken-users] Possible numbers bug, John Cowan, 2011/05/27
- Re: [Chicken-users] Possible numbers bug, Panos Stergiotis, 2011/05/27
- Re: [Chicken-users] Possible numbers bug, Kon Lovett, 2011/05/27