[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-users] awful as cgi or fcgi?
|
From: |
Alaric Snell-Pym |
|
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-users] awful as cgi or fcgi? |
|
Date: |
Sun, 20 Feb 2011 22:59:07 +0000 |
|
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100520 Lightning/1.0b2pre Shredder/3.0.4 |
On 02/20/11 15:36, Mario Domenech Goulart wrote:
>> In your second awful scenario the (rather wonderful afaict) awful must
>> still be a long running process, correct?
>
> Yes, that's correct.
The CGI could, if awful is not responding, fire it up though (with, if
rquired, steps taken to prevent two simultaneous requests firing up two
awfuls), if "I can't start daemons at startup as I'm not root" is an
issue here...
> Best wishes.
> Mario
ABS
--
Alaric Snell-Pym
http://www.snell-pym.org.uk/alaric/