[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-users] coops
From: |
Stephen Eilert |
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-users] coops |
Date: |
Wed, 2 Feb 2011 18:50:32 -0300 |
On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 5:29 PM, Felix
<address@hidden> wrote:
> From: Stephen Eilert <address@hidden>
> Subject: Re: [Chicken-users] coops
> Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2011 15:32:33 -0300
>
>> On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 2:24 PM, <address@hidden> wrote:
>>> Sometimes the simplest solution are the hardest to see. I do not have to use
>>> coops-primitive-objects, I can define my own hierarchie of primitive
>>> objects.
>>
>> That is my experience as well. Every time I import
>> coops-primitive-objects, I end up removing it some time later.
>
> After all the work I put into it? My heart bleeds ...
I've yet to define generic methods on, say, continuations or threads.
I assume coops-primitive-objects will be much more useful for those.
The issue is not with coops-primitive-objects. Instead, as a program
progresses it is sometimes useful to redefine old functions and have
them accept more 'specialized' objects.
Maybe that's just me.
--Stephen
Sent from my Emacs