[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Chicken-users] coops

From: schugk
Subject: Re: [Chicken-users] coops
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2011 11:55:27 +0100
User-agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) H3 (4.1.6)

This reflects the way scheme sees lists, which are build of pairs:

Jeha, i know. A list is a pair, but a pair is not a list. Therefore a list should be a subclass of pair. (Ok, for '() we have <null>).

And the other point is, that i can not specialized generic procedures for <pair> and <list>. Maybe it is intended (?).


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]