Re: [Chicken-users] jbogenturfa'i: "Error: stack overflow"

[Alan Post]

On Mon, Dec 06, 2010 at 05:08:32PM +0100, Jörg F. Wittenberger wrote:
> Am Montag, den 06.12.2010, 08:46 -0700 schrieb Alan Post:
> > I selected equal? in this case because the *lists* aren't going to
> > be pointer-equal, just their contents, and the contents fall into
> > two distinct classes, procedures and strings, and the strings won't
> > be eq? for the same reason the lists aren't.
> > 
> Just an idea (which is probably a bad one, if your strings come from
> dynamic input as opposed to local, static data like grammars or alike):
> Feed the strings through string->symbol.
> 

Actually, that's quite a good idea.  I'm not attached to the
stringyness of the data, I believe later the string becomes a
keyword, so I can move that calculation up before this code.

Wonderful, thank you.

-Alan
-- 
.i ko djuno fi le do sevzi