[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-users] Qt egg - understanding it
From: |
Felix |
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-users] Qt egg - understanding it |
Date: |
Tue, 24 Aug 2010 12:39:13 +0200 (CEST) |
From: Arthur Maciel <address@hidden>
Subject: [Chicken-users] Qt egg - understanding it
Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2010 23:15:04 -0300
>
> Isn't it possible to directly map every procedure/slot of a Qt widget into
> an equivalent Scheme code?
Unfortunately not without generating a huge pile of wrapper code (see
"Smoke", which does that for PyQt). The qt egg we currently have takes
advantage of the fact that properties can be dynamically changed, but
(currently) only explicitly wrapped methods can be invoked. Some
widget-classes are available directly for convenience, though, but the
selection is (currently) more or less arbitrary.
cheers,
felix
- [Chicken-users] Qt egg - understanding it, Arthur Maciel, 2010/08/23
- Re: [Chicken-users] Qt egg - understanding it,
Felix <=
- Re: [Chicken-users] Qt egg - understanding it, Arthur Maciel, 2010/08/24
- Re: [Chicken-users] Qt egg - understanding it, Felix, 2010/08/24
- Re: [Chicken-users] Qt egg - understanding it, Arthur Maciel, 2010/08/24
- Re: [Chicken-users] Qt egg - understanding it, Sean D'Epagnier, 2010/08/25
- Re: [Chicken-users] Qt egg - understanding it, Felix, 2010/08/25
- Re: [Chicken-users] Qt egg - understanding it, Martin DeMello, 2010/08/25
- Re: [Chicken-users] Qt egg - understanding it, Arthur Maciel, 2010/08/25
- Re: [Chicken-users] Qt egg - understanding it, Martin DeMello, 2010/08/25
- Re: [Chicken-users] Qt egg - understanding it, Felix, 2010/08/26
- Re: [Chicken-users] Qt egg - understanding it, Andrei Barbu, 2010/08/29