[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-users] syntax-case and Chicken 4.2.0
From: |
John Cowan |
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-users] syntax-case and Chicken 4.2.0 |
Date: |
Wed, 11 Nov 2009 11:29:01 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) |
Thomas Bushnell BSG scripsit:
> In one sense, this is good news!
The two main pieces of good news in Chicken 4 are built-in macros and
built-in modules.
> A question: does the builtin syntax-rules accept the (... ...) syntax
> that Dybvig's system does? My code has some macros that expand to macro
> definitions, the canonical case where nested ... is often necessary.
I doubt it, but _solvitur ambulando_.
--
John Cowan address@hidden http://ccil.org/~cowan
Any sufficiently-complicated C or Fortran program contains an ad-hoc,
informally-specified bug-ridden slow implementation of half of Common Lisp.
--Greenspun's Tenth Rule of Programming (rules 1-9 are unknown)