Re: [Chicken-users] Proposed procedure movement in Chicken 4

[Derrell Piper]

Someone asked me what I meant by my first comment.  I checked  
Salmonella and it reports the following statistics for eggs (4 on top,  
3 on bottom):

Failed  99
Succeed 334     (76%)
Skipped 4
Total           437

Failed  65
Succeed 139 (67%)
Skipped 4
Total           208

...which seems to indicate that less than half the eggs made the  
transition from 3 to 4.  I think that that's probably not a good  
thing.  The plethora of eggs is one of Chicken's major strengths.  I  
just wanted to point that out if you're considering changes that might  
break even more of them.

On Sep 9, 2009, at 12:16 PM, Derrell Piper wrote:

> Seems like you already have a substantial broken egg problem with  
> Chicken 4 already.  You sure you want to break yet more eggs?  Do  
> you have the ability to fix all the eggs?  If so I think you should  
> consider that as part of this re-org.  I also dislike 'Utils';  
> that's awfully generic.  You've already got 'extras'.  Is that  
> function in Utils or Extras?  Precisely.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Chicken-users mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users