[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-users] Re: Questions about modules
From: |
felix winkelmann |
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-users] Re: Questions about modules |
Date: |
Fri, 19 Jun 2009 09:33:28 +0200 |
On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 5:09 PM, Jack Trades<address@hidden> wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 7:32 AM, felix <address@hidden> wrote:
>>
>> Prefixing syntax identifiers from base modules apparently doesn't seem
>> to work (I assume, because the base modules like "scheme" and "chicken"
>> are put together by hand and have a special status) in the moment.
>
> Thanks for the info. At least now I have an idea of what's going on and can
> re-think
> my design.
>
Please try the current trunk - the prefixed import issue is possibly
resolved (I also generated a new bootstrapping tarball).
cheers,
felix
- [Chicken-users] Questions about modules, Jack Trades, 2009/06/15
- Re: [Chicken-users] Questions about modules, John Cowan, 2009/06/15
- Re: [Chicken-users] Questions about modules, Peter Danenberg, 2009/06/15
- [Chicken-users] Re: Questions about modules, Jack Trades, 2009/06/17
- [Chicken-users] Re: Questions about modules, felix, 2009/06/18
- Re: [Chicken-users] Re: Questions about modules, Jack Trades, 2009/06/18
- Re: [Chicken-users] Re: Questions about modules,
felix winkelmann <=
- Re: [Chicken-users] Re: Questions about modules, Jack Trades, 2009/06/19
- Re: [Chicken-users] Re: Questions about modules, felix winkelmann, 2009/06/22
- Re: [Chicken-users] Re: Questions about modules, Jack Trades, 2009/06/22
- Re: [Chicken-users] Re: Questions about modules, felix winkelmann, 2009/06/23