Re: [Chicken-users] s11n and tinyclos

[Joshua Griffith]

Hey Felix,

Have you had a chance to take a look at the s11n corrupted input issue?

#;1> (use s11n)
; loading /usr/local/lib/chicken/3/s11n.so ...
#;2> (deserialize (open-input-string "\f"))
Bus error

Thanks,

Josh

On Dec 5, 2008, at 2:39 AM, felix winkelmann wrote:

> On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 8:09 AM, Shawn Rutledge
> <address@hidden> wrote:
> > On 10/29/08, felix winkelmann <address@hidden> wrote:
> > > This means that no entry is stored in the local "procedure table".
> > > What's the output of "chicken -version"? Does it show "ptables"?
> >
> > Sorry I didn't get back to you sooner...
> >
> > Yes it has ptables.
> >
> > [neutron][12:08:00 AM] chicken -version
> >
> > CHICKEN
> > (c)2008 The Chicken Team
> > (c)2000-2007 Felix L. Winkelmann
> > Version 3.4.0 - linux-unix-gnu-x86-64   [ 64bit manyargs dload  
> > ptables
> > applyhook hostpcre ]
> > SVN rev. 11987  compiled 2008-10-23 on neutron (Linux)
> >
> > I get the same result on a 32-bit machine too.
>
> Is it possible, that you are using stale eggs? Could you try to
> reinstall the eggs you need for your application (or install
> a new chicken into a temporary location and install all
> eggs from scratch)? If all involved modules generate ptables
> properly, then the behaviour you observer should actually not be  
> possible
> (if it does, then some compiled procs are not ptable'd, which would
> be a severe bug). All .so's and libraries should export a  
> "create_ptable"
> symbol, which you can check with
>
>  nm <so-or-lib> | grep create_ptable
>
>
> cheers,
> felix
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Chicken-users mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users