[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-users] Bug in canonical-path?
From: |
felix winkelmann |
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-users] Bug in canonical-path? |
Date: |
Thu, 30 Oct 2008 09:56:04 +0100 |
On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 12:46 AM, Ivan Raikov <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> Actually, I think it would be nice to have a tool that can
> automatically create a custom Chicken shared library that only
> includes the units that user specifies, and perhaps that can also
> statically link eggs to that library. For example, if I want to deploy
> a standalone application that does not use the regex and tcp units,
> but uses matchable and filepath, this hypothetical tool would be able
> to create a Chicken library that includes statically compiled
> syntax-case, matchable and filepath, but no regex or tcp units. What
> do people think about this?
This is already possible by appropriate juggling of linking commands
and/or static linking of applications. Generally, this is a great idea.
The devil is in the details, like platform-specific linking and compile-time vs
run-time issues.
cheers,
felix
- [Chicken-users] Bug in canonical-path?, Matthew Welland, 2008/10/25
- Re: [Chicken-users] Bug in canonical-path?, Elf, 2008/10/26
- Re: [Chicken-users] Bug in canonical-path?, Peter Bex, 2008/10/26
- Re: [Chicken-users] Bug in canonical-path?, Vincent Manis, 2008/10/26
- Re: [Chicken-users] Bug in canonical-path?, Ivan Raikov, 2008/10/29
- Re: [Chicken-users] Bug in canonical-path?, felix winkelmann, 2008/10/29
- Re: [Chicken-users] Bug in canonical-path?, Peter Bex, 2008/10/29
- Re: [Chicken-users] Bug in canonical-path?, felix winkelmann, 2008/10/29
- Re: [Chicken-users] Bug in canonical-path?, Elf, 2008/10/29
- Re: [Chicken-users] Bug in canonical-path?, Ivan Raikov, 2008/10/29
- Re: [Chicken-users] Bug in canonical-path?,
felix winkelmann <=
- Re: [Chicken-users] Bug in canonical-path?, Alex Shinn, 2008/10/30
- Re: [Chicken-users] Bug in canonical-path?, John Cowan, 2008/10/26
- Re: [Chicken-users] Bug in canonical-path?, Elf, 2008/10/28
- Re: [Chicken-users] Bug in canonical-path?, John Cowan, 2008/10/28
- Re: [Chicken-users] Bug in canonical-path?, Elf, 2008/10/28
- Re: [Chicken-users] Bug in canonical-path?, Elf, 2008/10/28