[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Chicken-users] Why is the format egg "redundant or unsupported"?

From: felix winkelmann
Subject: Re: [Chicken-users] Why is the format egg "redundant or unsupported"?
Date: Sat, 27 Sep 2008 23:17:54 +0200

On Sat, Sep 27, 2008 at 6:56 PM, Matthew Welland <address@hidden> wrote:
> While I really like eformat I tend to use the format egg quite a bit. It has
> no external dependancies and works everywhere (i.e. at work, on the nokia
> n800 etc.).
> I hope that being down in that section of the eggs page doesn't imply that
> the format egg is at risk of going away? If so is there another format
> implementation with minimal dependencies that I should be using instead?

If this is the case, we can just un-unsupport it. There is
format-modular (but is
has quite a number of dependencies) and fmt, which is much cooler (but
has the odd bug, IIRC). But if you like the old format egg to stay, it stays.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]