[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-users] Segfault - a hard one
From: |
Peter Hochgemuth |
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-users] Segfault - a hard one |
Date: |
Tue, 05 Aug 2008 13:58:59 +0200 |
Hi all,
(this is actually Joerg using Peter's machine).
Am Montag, den 04.08.2008, 21:20 -0500 schrieb Jim Ursetto:
> Ran okay here. Do you have more stats about your environment, chicken
> version, a less complicated program that can reproduce the problem,
> etc.?
The environment, where the case came up: my Laptop: 64 Bit Intel-HW, 32
Bit Ubuntu, chicken from svn (up to date yesterday) build with
DEBUGBUILD=1.
Results: Segfault and "heap full".
Here: Debian stable, 64 Bit. Results: Success and "heap full".
Virtualbox (32 bit) with chicken-livecd-0.3.iso (downloaded is from 30th
Apr).
Results: Sucess, "heap full", Segfault
Attached a further simplified test case. It becomes clear to me that
"thread-terminate!" appears to be the problematic call. On the livecd,
we just saw about 50% Segfault and 50% success for that version of
"ttm". BUT: as soon as I coment out the call to "thread-terminate!" it
runs without problems, even in a loop.
best regards
/Jörg
ttm.scm
Description: Text Data
- [Chicken-users] Segfault - a hard one, F. Wittenberger, 2008/08/04
- Re: [Chicken-users] Segfault - a hard one, felix winkelmann, 2008/08/07
- Re: [Chicken-users] Segfault - a hard one, Vincent Manis, 2008/08/07
- Re: [Chicken-users] Segfault - a hard one, John Cowan, 2008/08/07
- Re: [Chicken-users] Segfault - a hard one, F. Wittenberger, 2008/08/07
- Re: [Chicken-users] Segfault - a hard one, John Cowan, 2008/08/07
- Re: [Chicken-users] Segfault - a hard one, Vincent Manis, 2008/08/08
- Re: [Chicken-users] Segfault - a hard one, F. Wittenberger, 2008/08/08
- Re: [Chicken-users] Segfault - a hard one, Thomas Chust, 2008/08/08
- Re: [Chicken-users] Segfault - a hard one, felix winkelmann, 2008/08/08
- Re: [Chicken-users] Segfault - a hard one, John Cowan, 2008/08/08