Re: [Chicken-users] hygienic branch (progress report, sort of)

[felix winkelmann]

On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 12:34 PM, Hans Bulfone <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> my question is: will it still be possible to write a (er-) macro that
> creates new identifiers like define-record does? from previous
> postings i got differing impressions.
> i know it's not considered good style to do that but it saved me a lot
> of typing in the directfb egg and those macros are only used
> internally and not made available to user code.

Yes, that is possible. I will try to add some examples in the
documentation.


cheers,
felix