Re: [Chicken-users] thread-sleep! using milliseconds->time is broken

[Jim Ursetto]

Graham,

There is a thread entitled "thread-sleep! for less than a second" from 12 Jan
2007 which discusses this issue.  Basically it was an either/or thing and the
current way won.  I just was not aware of the proper usage.  I used Daishi's
shorter solution and just made a local procedure in the egg.


On 4/7/08, Graham Fawcett <address@hidden> wrote:
> Yes, defining (thread-sleep/microseconds!) in a separate unit seems an
> expedient way around the problem. (Or we could extend our SRFI-18 and
> add this procedure there  -- just my two cents, but that seems like a
> reasonable extension, given the commonality of compiling with
> fixnum-arithmetic.)