chicken-users
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: chicken literary spoofs (was: Re: argument against using '() for nul


From: Elf
Subject: Re: chicken literary spoofs (was: Re: argument against using '() for null values? ([Chicken-users] DBI))
Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2008 14:26:00 -0800 (PST)

On Mon, 3 Mar 2008, Shawn Rutledge wrote:

On Mon, Mar 3, 2008 at 2:40 PM, Graham Fawcett <address@hidden> wrote:
 Fortunately, Chicken Literary and his friends visited the fox, Henry
 Baker, who reminded them that their stacks are GC'd frequently. All
 was well again in Chicken Literary Land!

 But when he added that function-calls never return, Chicken Literary
 and friends lapsed into an existential stupor. And Henry the Fox ate
 them.

You handled the continuation very well, congratulations.  Not a very
happy ending though.  After (eat ...) I suppose the return value is
undefined, isn't it...


nah, its not undefined. there is no return value, remember? and the continuation is clearly 'eat -> burp -> digest'

-elf




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]