Re: [Chicken-users] two procedures looking for a good home

[Alejandro Forero Cuervo]

> No worries, I was just joking. :-) I agree, the redundancy is
> pointless. It's pointless, I say.

Ahh, hahahahah, I thought you were serious.  Sowwy.

> I'd like to add a (sort/decorated lst cmp key) proc to your orders
> egg, that calculates the key values only once; this can be more
> efficient than (sort ... (cmp-key ...)) for cases where key generation
> is expensive. I think it fits in your egg; are you OK with that?

You are still joking here, right?

(See the sort-key-cache function in said egg.) ;-)

Heheh.

Alejo, feeling very redundant with Graham today. :-)
http://azul.freaks-unidos.net/