|
From: | Elf |
Subject: | Re: [Chicken-users] Idea feedback |
Date: | Thu, 14 Feb 2008 15:12:32 -0800 (PST) |
On Thu, 14 Feb 2008, john wrote:
Yes, I remember talk of dbus! Any progress Shawn? I am actually doing what you describe now and embedding Chicken to C to handle s-expressions and bit stuffing them (packedobjects). I was curious though to examine ways of removing the dependency of Chicken from the graphical client and using dbus to communicate with another entity that handles the s-expressions. Removing Chicken would simplify building the graphical client on the mobile. The problem is just moved to another place and hidden from C developers who could focus on the client. If that makes sense.
whats wrong with simply including libchicken.so (built for whatever platform) with the codeball for the graphical client? wouldnt need to build chicken again there and youd be simplifying interfaces and reducing dependencies...with a little work, you could even write some code that only used the bits of chicken you needed, compile that to a static lib, and send that, if space is at an insane premium...
-elf
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |