Re: [Chicken-users] egg documentation

[Ivan Raikov]

  I will look at rdoc, but you should look at mole :-) I think mole
follows a similar pattern, but the output formats are perhaps more
limited. As for the second idea, it is okay with me, but a long time
ago I wrote a proposal about incorporating eggdoc-like markup in
svnwiki, and nothing happened, so I am not holding my breath.

   -Ivan


raymond medeiros <address@hidden> writes:

> basically i was thinking about exactly what rdoc does ( i haven't
> used mole ) look at rdoc.  but then adding the ability to generate
> wiki code and import it into the svn wiki, and also the ability to
> generate various formats like pdf's, html etc...
>
> another idea was, in your egg:
>
> myegg.wiki
>
> which would contain the wiki page, and get imported into svn wiki.
> that way the maintainer has local control over the document,
> but it gets automatically imported into the wiki.  so you can
> edit it with VIM or EMACS check it in, and when the egg gets
> built it updates the appropriate wiki page, entering a new
> revision using the committers credentials.