Re: [Chicken-users] Runtime arity?

[Kon Lovett]

On Jan 29, 2008, at 10:37 AM, John Cowan wrote:

> Graham Fawcett scripsit:
>
> > Hm, is it just primitive C functions that need better "procedure
> > information"? It might be easier to fix that, than to build and
> > maintain a database.
>
> Really only the primitives that are also user-exposed, like +
> but unlike cons (which is not, technically, a primitive in Chicken).

Yes. By "database" I meant something that maps ##core#primitive  
procedures to "full" lambda info. Don't think it practical to change  
every use of '(##core#primitive "C_foo")' when a central lookup table  
can be built.

> --
> Samuel Johnson on playing the violin:           John Cowan
> "Difficult do you call it, Sir?                 address@hidden
>  I wish it were impossible."                    http://www.ccil.org/ 
> ~cowan

Best Wishes,
Kon