[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-users] memcached
From: |
Alaric Snell-Pym |
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-users] memcached |
Date: |
Wed, 20 Jun 2007 11:21:03 +0100 |
On 20 Jun 2007, at 11:05 am, Dan Muresan wrote:
That's why my generic cache interface is intended to be a front-end
to different cache implementations, with a common interface, and some
tools built on top of that interface (such as memoizing functions).
Yes, I understand the philosophy, but before you can make a generic
API, one should study several concrete examples and generalize from
their needs. Currently, you have a single example (your own
memcached). So I'm a little wary...
Ah, a valid point. Well, I do have another example, the cache in
spiffy, which is the in-memory LRU implementation I had in mind... I
was planning on a filesystem-based cache, too.
Well, for now, I'll finish the memcached egg (it seems to be
consensus that it needs its own egg), then we can talk about a
generic cache frontend later :-)
-- Dan
ABS
--
Alaric Snell-Pym
Work: http://www.snell-systems.co.uk/
Play: http://www.snell-pym.org.uk/alaric/
Blog: http://www.snell-pym.org.uk/?author=4