Re: [Chicken-users] csc segfaults with certain recursive sources

[felix winkelmann]

On 5/26/07, Dan Muresan <address@hidden> wrote:
> $ cat x.scm
> (require 'y)
>
> (module x (fx)
>    (define fx 10)
> )
>
> $ cat y.scm
> (require 'x) (require-for-syntax 'x) (import x)
>
> (define fy 20)
>
> $ csc -R syntax-case -s x.scm
> $ csc -R syntax-case -s y.scm
> Error: (open-input-file) can not open file - Too many open files: "./x.so"

Serves you quite right - a segfault is not sufficient for someone who does
these perverted things. You should rightfully suffer for this...

- syntax-case does not support mutually recursive modules
- don't use "require" or "require-for-syntax" if you can avoid them
- chicken just does what you are asking it to do
- what are you trying to achieve?


cheers,
felix